WA seniors were let into the school on April 9 at 10 p.m. to follow through with a senior prank. According to Principal Dan Twomey, this senior prank is the first in 25 years.
According to Twomey, WA custodians are present in the building until around 10:30 p.m. Students on the night of the event showed up and were let into the building without custodians knowing their intentions.
“Students come back from trips and field trips and athletic events,” Twomey said. “I would say the custodians let the students into the building not knowing what they needed to do. […] What came across as a few individuals became a rush of students coming into the building.”
The seniors carried out their prank by opening lockers, putting up balloons and streamers, writing inappropriate things with washable markers on windows, and writing things with chalk paints, according to Twomey.
Involved seniors were punished in response to their actions.
“I think with any situation, we try to deem what we feel is an appropriate consequence for the action,” Twomey said.
A senior involved in the prank, who will be kept anonymous, stated that they understood there would be consequences.
“In a way I do understand the punishments given. Although I don’t think it was that big a deal, I do understand that administration had to give punishments to show underclassmen this will not be tolerated,” the student said. “Many of us thought it would be forcing us to stay after school to clean everything up, which we had already told the janitorial staff we would do the night of the prank.”
However, the student believed that the consequences were not divided fairly.
“They could identify us on the security cameras but didn’t divide up punishments based on what each of us individually did, [even though] some people did more than others. I wish they would’ve administered scoldings and punishments based on this instead of grouping us all together,” the student said.
According to Twomey, pranks are unsafe and can cause harm to individuals.
“We’ve tried to make it not a thing because what happens is destruction. People get hurt and real things happen,” Twomey said.
The involved student mentioned that, in their opinion, the prank was blown out of proportion.
“I personally don’t think it should’ve been as big a deal as the school made it out to be. I understand having a talk with us like Mr. Twomey did about how what we did was wrong, but I think it was an overreaction,” the student said. “I don’t like the way we were made out to be disrespectful or criminals for a harmless prank. I wish we had been talked to in a more respectful way.”

Anonymous • May 10, 2026 at 2:49 pm
As someone involved in the prank, let me make it clear that there was absolutely nothing destructive involved. We decorated the school with balloons and streamers and wrote harmless messages about the Class of 2026 leaving in washable chalk markers. Furthermore, this whole prank started as us initially decorating the exterior of the school. One of the janitors came outside to see what we were doing and agreed to let us inside upon someone asking. If the janitor had come outside and asked us to leave, we would have done so. I would also like to add that Mr Twomey told us students that the janitor was going to be fired (which is unbelievably unprofessional) only for us to find out that the statement was a scare tactic and that the janitor was never actually fired. As someone involved, please don’t believe what Mr Twomey and other members of administration are saying about this because it is entirely false.
Kate H • May 9, 2026 at 12:23 pm
I can’t believe they fired the custodian. If I did a prank that caused someone to lose their livelihood, I would not whine about getting yelled at and do everything I could to have that person reinstated!
Anonymous • May 10, 2026 at 3:02 pm
Nope, the janitor was never fired. Mr Twomey said “they had to deliver some tough news” to us students, which is incredibly inappropriate. Furthermore, several of us emailed our dean to ask for clarification about what that meant (myself included). Speaking on my own experience, the dean completely skated over that entire part of my email in her response to me and simply said “thank you for your thoughts” which I thought was unprofessional. My friends and I later saw the janitor involved at the school while we were helping clean up after an event as part of our community service punishment. So no, he was never fired and the administration is spreading lies.
Celia Couture • May 8, 2026 at 6:45 pm
You destroyed property. Lied, and you want to
Be treated with respect? Seriously
Anonymous • May 10, 2026 at 2:41 pm
I’m not sure where you’re hearing that property was destroyed, but that was not the case. Balloons and streamers were decorated around the school and some “class of 2026 out” phrases were written with washable chalk markers on the windows. And also, no lying was involved as the janitor was fully aware what our intentions were. Sincerely, a student involved.
Paul Donaghue • May 8, 2026 at 6:12 pm
Class of 1973 holds the record for senior prank.
Christopher Michael • May 8, 2026 at 9:08 pm
Well what was it?
Ronan Conn • May 8, 2026 at 5:00 pm
Are there pictures of the prank? Was it funny or just destructive? I’m not condoning it, but I’m curious for more context about the prank?